You cannot register for this webinar

This webinar has ended. Thank you for your interest.

Topic
Philosophy and Conspiracy Theories
Date & Time

Selected Sessions:

Mar 17, 2025 02:00 PM

Description
This event is part of a new series of UoB-led #PhilosophyMatters webinars on the importance of Philosophy. What is the role of philosophy in tackling the presence of conspiracy theories in society? This webinar showcases the interdisciplinary nature of the philosophical work being done in this area, working alongside scholars in Theology, Psychiatry, Psychology and Adaptation Studies. The webinar is chaired by Lisa Bortolotti and will feature as panellists Joseph Pierre, U-Wen Low, Nele Van de Mosselaer and Kathleen-Murphy-Hollies. Lisa, U-Wen and Kathleen are all members of an interdisciplinary project, ‘Film, Storytelling and Conspiracies’, and will talk about how a common focus on ‘storytelling’ is guiding collaborative work on conspiracy theorising. Joseph is a Health Sciences Clinical Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at University of California, SF. He has extensive clinical experience working with individuals with psychotic disorders. His research interests include schizophrenia, the intersection of psychosis and religion, and delusion-like beliefs and conspiracy theories. U-Wen is Assistant Professor in Public Religion, and will trace a history of conspiracy theories in ancient theological texts. He will also discuss the ongoing prevalence of theological themes in conspiracy theorising today, considering whether these theological themes bring a compelling narrativity. Kathleen is a research fellow in philosophy, and will be joined by fellow philosopher Nele Van de Mosselaer (Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Tilburg University). They will talk about the role of narrative in individuals coming to believe in a conspiracy theory. If a conspiracy theory has the structure of a really good story that strongly resonates with an individual, this may dispose them to believe that theory despite its significant flaws. Together they will compare conspiracy theorising with engagement with fictions and fandoms.